37 Years Of Data Totally Debunks The ‘Good Guy With A Gun’ Argument

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Tragic mass shootings are, sadly, becoming the norm in the United States.

It seems that nearly every week, news outlets report on yet another gunman killing innocent people in movie theaters, concerts, schools, nightclubs and even churches — and Americans are( and have been) extremely divided about how to stimulate them stop. On one side are those who believe the only route to stop gun violence is to enact stricter laws, attaining the weapons more difficult or impossible to procure. On the other are staunch those in favour of the right to carry handguns. The latter please give many reasons why they stand behind their beliefs, one of the more popular being the “good guy with a gun” theory.

After the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, National Rifle Association leader Wayne LaPierre said the “only way to stop a bad guy with a firearm is a good guy with a gun, ” tapping into the powerful heroic fiction of an armed citizen saving the working day and stopping a shooter. It’s nice to think about, sure. The only problem is that it isn’t accurate.

While there surely have been cases of armed citizens subduing shooters, they’re the exception , not the rule. In a working paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research in June, academics at Stanford Law School analyse U.S. crime data regarding 1977 to 2014 and determined that right-to-carry( RTC) statutes are linked with higher violent crime rates.

With statistics from the US Census Bureau and the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting data, the paper authors were able to estimate that crime rates in states with stricter concealed-carry laws fell by 42 percentage in those 37 years, while RTC states only insured a 9 percent decrease.

The writers were also able to confirm that certain differences were, in fact, due to firearm laws by creating a synthetic control. Taking data collected from states after RTC statutes were enacted, they used an algorithm that allowed them to compare it to projections of crime data resulting as if the laws had never been put into place.

more deaths.

Read more: http :// www.viralnova.com



Leave a Replay

%d bloggers like this: